Even a chimp can write code

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

Proof that Natural Selection really works

If you needed any proof that Natural Selection really works, look no further than the election results from Dover, PA. At the polls, voters yesterday booted out eight of the nine Dover Area School Board members — all Republicans — who last year engineered the inclusion of intelligent design in the curriculum. That decision by the school board gave Dover the unique distinction of being the first school district in America to order the introduction of intelligent design in school curricullum. The policy required students to hear a statement about intelligent design before learning about evolution. The statement says Charles Darwin's theory is "not a fact" and has inexplicable "gaps."

Talk about learning the hard way!

Email this | Bookmark this

3 Comments:

  • It's a four-paragraph statement this month, 6 paragraphs next month, 10 paragraphs the next month, a completely revamped textbook next school year, and evolution theory removed entirely from all textbooks in 5 years.

    You fight it now, when they're just nibbling at your fingers, so that you don't have to fight it when they've devoured your entire hand.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at November 25, 2005 at 12:04 PM  

  • Let's face it, intelligent design is merely a facade for creationism. And a rather transparent one at that. If intellgent design even belongs in schools, it belongs in the philosophy or religion classes, not in science class. Unlike those other branches, science holds a far higher burden of proof. Besides, people who believe in science - regardless of their religious affilations - can sleep peacefully at night knowing that what is unknown is not unknowable or a mark of the divine, merely that it is unanswered or unproven.

    By Blogger Ashish Shetty, at November 28, 2005 at 1:19 PM  

  • So a chimp can write a code?? Thats amassing! But haven't chimps been able to do a lot of the stuff humans do? The amount of calculations that go on to simply close or open a hand are so complex they take the greatest computers hours to work out. So a chimp being able to do much more than close his hand would prove that his brain is superior to a computer, would that not make him intelligent? Actually, Intelligence is a property of mind that encompasses many related mental abilities, such as the capacities to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend ideas and language, and learn.
    Learn, Hmm doesn't that mean that if a chimp can Learn how to write a code, or act in the circus, or walk on his hands, he is intelligent? Does it not?
    Any being with the ability to write a code has a form of intelligence.

    A code has to be created by an intelligent being. What code do you have or can you show that proves that a code can be natural?
    There are rules to a code being written, making it impossible to be naturally occurring. This is saying that there must be a author of DNA because DNA is IN FACT a code.

    Now natural selection? I believe that there is a meaning behind Natural selection, its simple genetics.

    For instance; AA is long hair BB is short hair AB is medium.

    You have some dogs,
    1)AA,BB
    2)AA,BB
    Possibilities of decendets;
    AA,AA BB,BB AB,AB AA,AB etc.
    In the arctic BB,BB or AB,BB and some AA,BB and AB,AB's would Freeze
    So soon you are left with only
    AA,AA, or AA,AB soon the B gene just disappears.
    And in the Desert, the A genes would die off. That is not evolution, that is simply Genetics.

    Evolution is not possible because information cannot naturally be added, so you say that a mutation is added information but in fact it is not, every mutation known to man has been a replication of data that was already within the cell no new Information has been acquired only replicated.

    Evolution can NEVER be empirical information because it can never be monitored or proven to exist, it requires "billions" of years to take place there fore making it impossible to monitor.

    I think ill take a breather from that one.

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at November 27, 2007 at 7:57 PM  

Post a Comment | Home | Inference: my personal blog