RE: Gosling on unsafe code
I tried to comment on Cedric's post but his filter wouldn't let me get my admittedly benign thoughts in. So I figured I'd create a post here.
I agree with Cedric. C'mon, if you love Java there's no reason to slander .Net to prove it.
.Net has code access security which relies on policies, much like Java does. The .Net CLI looks at code as two broad categories: verifiable (VB.NET and C#) and non-verifiable (C, C++). It is well understood that C++ language features like reinterpret_cast are not type safe. Maybe for this reason the ability to load non-verifiable code is itself a policy that must be explicitly granted to code via policy.
I agree with Cedric. C'mon, if you love Java there's no reason to slander .Net to prove it.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment | Home | Inference: my personal blog